3 ms·
You have it completely backwards. Suburbs aren't scalable. That's why back in the 50s-70s when they were first built, they were amazing, but today, they are rif
by xmprt 5y ago
You have it completely backwards. Suburbs aren't scalable. That's why back in the 50s-70s when they were first built, they were amazing, but today, they are rife with traffic problems, noise pollution, and crumbling infrastructure.
- treis 5y agoThe percentage of the population living in the suburbs is growing, not shrinking.
- ZoomerCretin 5y ago"O(n^2) sorting time doesn't scale." "The amount of data we are going to sort in O(n^2) is growing, not shrinking." Notice how the second statement doesn't disprove the first.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]