I think it’s fine. Software usually Darwins out a language winner. There’s a reason a lot of things got built with Perl, python, js, Java, c++, ruby, php, and t

I think it’s fine. Software usually Darwins out a language winner. There’s a reason a lot of things got built with Perl, python, js, Java, c++, ruby, php, and there will be a reason why things won’t be written in those languages anymore (or aren’t anymore). There’s no amount of will that can force the hand of god and make Rust or Typescript ubiquitous or not-ubiquitous in the long run. We learn our lessons slowly. The winning language always surfaces itself in the form of useful software. If it’s true that these new language constructs are useful, pain-free, then we will surely see the ubiquity of those languages and the corresponding software with it. If it’s not useful, then nothing useful will come of it. It will be just another exercise in technical virtuosity, a master violinist playing a technically profound tune that no one likes to listen to. You’ll just have to enjoy it for the feat that it is, but it’s not something people will want to sit through regularly. Cheers, design away, I’ll see you on the other side of the cacophony.