5 ms·
In many cases yes, it is the result of binning, but the 486 SX (my first comment incorrectly said 386) was an intentionally disabled 486 DX. From memory, you co
by milderworkacc 5y ago
In many cases yes, it is the result of binning, but the 486 SX (my first comment incorrectly said 386) was an intentionally disabled 486 DX. From memory, you could then purchase a 487, which was actually just a full-fat 486 DX to slot into your co-processor slot as an 'upgrade'!