3 ms·

> To forcibly deprive them of their property is the removal of some portion of their life. This portion can be made whole again by replacing the property, eith

• esyir 5y ago
  Replacing property is still depriving others, just in aggregate, rather than on an individual level. Are e so divorced from the concept of how property is obtained that we think we can magic it out of an infinite pool?
  • Nursie 5y ago
    > Replacing property is still depriving others, just in aggregate Not if the original property is retrieved or the thief is made to pay. I'm not sure in the context of this discussion, the worth of a human life, that your plea to consider where stuff comes from is that important.
    • esyir 5y ago
      I see property in the current context as a proportion of a life. People invest time and effort, the better part of their lives to create and acquire property. The theft of such is thus a theft of said life.
      • ketzo 5y ago
        And so if I take a candy bar from a drugstore counter, I deserve a 9mm round between the eyes?
        • esyir 5y ago
          Sure, if you want to have 0 sense of proportionality. Steal a candy bar, no biggie. Steal a car and I won't sweat that death. Ideally though, the police would intervene. That they aren't is the root cause of this problem.
      • Nursie 5y ago
        > The theft of such is thus a theft of said life. In an entirely reversible manner.