4 ms·
>Crabs and lobsters are basically bugs Not really. You might as well say humans are basically zebras.
by phonypc 5y ago
>Crabs and lobsters are basically bugs
Not really. You might as well say humans are basically zebras.
- robbrown451 5y ago"Bug," in its most common usage, is a large category that includes spiders, insects, and other arthropods. Crustaceans (which includes pill bugs a.k.a. roly polies) are arthropods. So I'm not seeing your zebra analogy.
- ofrzeta 5y agoIt's more like saying humans are apes.
- robbrown451 5y agoYes, both are cladistically correct, but debatable on semantic/usage grounds.
- phonypc 5y agoIf you want to expand the category "bugs" to include all arthropods, then "crabs and lobsters are basically bugs" is kinda circular/superfluous. My comparison at that point would become "humans and zebras are basically chordates"... which is true but not very meaningful in context.
- robbrown451 5y agoIt's not so black and white. Bug is not a scientific term (well, not in its common usage), so it has blurry boundaries. Some definitions say "insect-like", some say "small arthropod", and so on. Lobsters etc are clearly in the gray area. So "basically bugs" is pretty spot on.... it is similar to bugs in the ways that matter to the conversation. And it isn't circular or superfluous in that conversation, since the point that they are similar to other arthropods (which we tend to not give a lot of concern to the pain they might experience), is relevant and seemed to have been missed by those passing the law.