3 ms·

Of course, and I myself play at 144Hz and would probably do the same. I think I just took an issue with the statement that most gamers are CPU limited nowadays

Of course, and I myself play at 144Hz and would probably do the same. I think I just took an issue with the statement that most gamers are CPU limited nowadays - and while in strictly technical sense that's true, I don't think that a few years old CPU being able to run games at solid 60fps+ is a problem in any sense. Again, it's not like it physically can't run the game, it just doesn't run it "well enough" for some people.

asdfasgasdgasdg 5y ago
> I just took an issue with the statement that most gamers are CPU limited nowadays I didn't say most gamers are CPU limited, though. I said "Depends on the type of game . . . there are many cases today where a strong CPU is required for gaming." I didn't say most cases. Conversely, it would be fine to observe that many console gamers have historically been satisfied with 30fps, and therefore PC gamers ought to only "require" a strong -2 gen i5 processor. While you're at it, you could also say that console gamers game at 1080p, so PC players should be satisfied with that as well. And you'd be right, under a certain configuration of preferences, and a certain interpretation of the word "require."