2 ms·
I search "spotify equalizer" and the first result has 4 stars, is ranked top 200 for all music apps, has recent updates, has a clean tracking score card (usage
by BoorishBears 5y ago
I search "spotify equalizer" and the first result has 4 stars, is ranked top 200 for all music apps, has recent updates, has a clean tracking score card (usage data not tracked)
Second result is a paid app, even higher rating, also top 200, no IAP.
Like yes, the app store has problems. But no, that is not why you'd be unable to find a 3rd party player for one of the largest streaming platforms.
- wintermutestwin 5y agoI search "apple music player" and I get 1 out of 20 apps that is actually appropriate. Notably, I get Amazon and Spotify players prominently placed. Reviews on app stores are dubious at best. Then you have the "in-app" purchases garbage.
- BoorishBears 5y ago"Prominently placed"... you mean placed with a clear "AD" button under the name? And instead of 20 results when there's no guarantee 20 quality apps even exist... what about the first result besides a clear ad and Apple Music itself? And what do you know, it's a top 100 app, over 12 years old, updated last month, and sitting at a 4.6 rating with 51k ratings.
- wintermutestwin 5y agoMusic Player? First off, it is "free" with in-app purchases, which translates to: we are hiding the cost of the app = sketchy nonsense. The age of the app is indeed a positive indicator, but reviews are not a good indicator. Also, it is yet another privacy rapist with all the unnecessary tracking. The worst part is that nowhere in the tiny blurb does it indicate that it actually works with Apple Music! Even when you do manage to find a potential replacement for Apple Music, Apple has locked devs out of key features like showing lyrics and the ability to remove anything from your library. This goes back to my original point...