3 ms·
Yeah I don't get this. Once the work is released it's out the artist's hands. The artist has no control. This is how it has always been and how it should alway
by tomc1985 5y ago
Yeah I don't get this. Once the work is released it's out the artist's hands.
The artist has no control. This is how it has always been and how it should always be.
- Pulcinella 5y agoThis is literally not true and is ahistorical. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_rights#Visual_Artists_Rights_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_rights#Visual_Artists_Ri...
- tomc1985 5y agoFirst of all, the law is only as good as its enforcement. Without enforcement the law effectively does nto exist. Second, that link says nothing about audience consumption, it only preserves the provenance and integrity of the work. As mentioned elsewhere copyright covers the rest but both of these constructs are mental and somewhat illusory. More importantly your audience has to subscribe to them to follow them. Third, at first glance that appears to only cover the USA. I am advocating for a rejection of these principles.