I think that economical aspects play an important role in suggesting how far we go with certain conservation efforts. I think few people will suggest that we sh

I think that economical aspects play an important role in suggesting how far we go with certain conservation efforts. I think few people will suggest that we should hunt wolves to extinction. So I would assume that most are okay with having wolves in national parks. The question is now: what about everywhere else? And this publication suggests that we might want to have wolves (almost) everywhere. While with, for example, bears or bison we might be better of having them mostly limited to selected regions. At that point, its not a question of conservation anymore, but of economic viability.