2 ms·
Cities don't actually have that much disposable money. Also - cities deprioritize the poor and struggling. Aside from the humaniarian aspect, does it really ma
by sgt 5y ago
Cities don't actually have that much disposable money.
Also - cities deprioritize the poor and struggling.
Aside from the humaniarian aspect, does it really make much sense spending millions on trying to rescue meth and fentanyl addicts? I doubt most tax payers would agree.
- willio58 5y agoOver the long term tax payers would probably save money if there were no drug addicts on the street. Less taxes to pay for healthcare when they get sick, prison sentences when they get punished for an illness, and you don’t have to pay for the foster system for each child they have.