4 ms·
Actually I agree with you that a "blockchain of law" would be great.. But that could also be done just by putting all law on somewhere public like github... O
by svennek 5y ago
Actually I agree with you that a "blockchain of law" would be great..
But that could also be done just by putting all law on somewhere public like github...
Or by having a block chain with a hard limit of 10 khashes/second per country (detecting cheaters is easy as far as I understand) and you can have a network of 200 raspberrypi zeros running it for around a single kilowatt..
- Ekaros 5y agoIt seems many of these ideas stem from failures of USA's political system. That is entrenched players fighting against government breaking their hold on their profit models even if that would be net benefit for general population. See taxation and even access to law, which I heard cost something 650$ a month from private provider. For example Finland already have laws online accessible for free: https://finlex.fi/en/ https://finlex.fi/en/ And Finland probably isn't only country doing this.
- svennek 5y agoHello fellow scandinavian. Well, it is the same in my country (Denmark), we have retsinformation.dk (litterally "information of the law"), but that does not hinder a corrupt state from altering "history" as they see fit. Also, my mother was a german teacher and her ex-DDR speakers (many who were quite some time in prison) told us that, that basically all of them where enprisoned with due process. Their problems were, that the laws where constructed so you were a criminal if you did X, but also (due to a different law) if you did not do X. It is the basic catch-22, that you cannot escape. You are intimately dependent on the benevolence of your state/society, and if your state/society is not benevolent you can only throw your life at trying to change it (for everybody else)... You will the most likely fail (and be dead) unless a lot of (by definition) uncoordinated action happens at once. Even in my country that boast of being a free and civil society we have problems once in a while. In the 1990 we had a police chief should (sadly for him on camera), "shoot at their legs" (police shooting at citizens is very uncommon in Denmark) at a somewhat violent demonstration. And we have what is called the Tibetian case where our police mislead protesters so that the visiting Chinese gov people did not have to look at the (otherwise legal) demonstration...