That's a different situation, because the LGPL is not a problematic license in terms of drafting. With LLVM, the license isn't really changing in spirit. The

That's a different situation, because the LGPL is not a problematic license in terms of drafting. With LLVM, the license isn't really changing in spirit. The concerns seem to be more practical — my understanding is that they're trying to get out from under a poorly drafted patent clause and also unify the code under a single license so they can move stuff around more easily.