4 ms·
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29278467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29278467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29284326 https://news.ycombina
by WalterGR 5y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29278467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29278467
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29284326 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29284326
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29282978 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29282978
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29279762 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29279762
- dang 5y agoIt's nice of you to provide links to past discussion but can you please make sure there's actual discussion at each link? HN users click on such links expecting to find comments and get ornery when they don't. For example, in this case I'd say these were good to link to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29278467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29278467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29282978 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29282978 but not these, as the first just has a single low-quality comment and the second just points to an earlier post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29284326 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29284326 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29279762 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29279762
- WalterGR 5y agoSure thing.