3 ms·
Well, instead of repeating it again and again, how about just stating it once, but this time with something like, you know, a proof? Or at least a source for th
by ManuelKiessling 5y ago
Well, instead of repeating it again and again, how about just stating it once, but this time with something like, you know, a proof? Or at least a source for the claim?
- vmception 5y agoyou want to me to prove what exactly? that russian federal and municipal government isnt going after ransomware operators despite having capability to know who they are? I’m trying to think of the best source for this? The assumptions themselves seem to arbitrary for me to bother disproving, the assumptions being: they’re anonymous they’re trying to be anonymous they’re using crypto to bolster their anonymity they need to convert the crypto to cash as opposed to just accumulating crypto because they prefer it This all relies on a complete misunderstanding of ransomware operations and why people in general like crypto that no single article will help. The best articles talk about negotiations with ransomware customer support, which simply show how brazen they are. Doesnt seem a satisfactory sourcr for anyone that has already created a negative assumption that needs to be disproven. What do you think? I’m completely fine with being at an impasse here, take it up with the ransomware SaaS providers they might even have an address listed at this point