3 ms·
Non anti-aliased fonts... That alone makes it non-atractive.
by marcodiego 5y ago
Non anti-aliased fonts... That alone makes it non-atractive.
- hermes8329 5y agoIt was really hideous. My first thought when reading the title was remembering how terrible it was and thinking "yuuuuck"
- wetmore 5y agoJeez, considering the author is in this thread perhaps you could be a little more polite.
- hermes8329 5y agoI apologize to the author but I was simply stating my experience with the software. There are countless pieces of software I have used with barely a memory. But this one in particular just prompted a visceral reaction from my usage
- Koshkin 5y agoIt’s acquired taste (like coffee).
- akx 5y agoThere is a screenshot explicitly titled "subpixel antialised fonts". http://www.jedit.org/index.php?page=screenshot&image=36 http://www.jedit.org/index.php?page=screenshot&image=36
- kitd 5y agoIt has anti-aliased fonts.
- vintermann 5y agoYeah, for a while it was some work to get it working though. Not jEdit's fault, but the JVMs/system defaults. The distro packaging wasn't great for a while, you would often get something fairly broken if you just went with the defaults.
- tablespoon 5y ago> Non anti-aliased fonts... Sign me up. Font aliasing is the devil's work.