4 ms·
Not quite. It acts as an access token, in about the purest sense, kind of like an auth token in traditional webapps. I could revoke access by blacklisting the N
by shiohime 5y ago
Not quite. It acts as an access token, in about the purest sense, kind of like an auth token in traditional webapps. I could revoke access by blacklisting the NFT if I really, really wanted to I suppose, but I don't in this specific service I've built, as there would be no reason whatsoever for me to revoke access to the interactive capabilities of my art from someone that purchased it, and never would implement such a thing.
Edit - For the other cases you added to your original post, I've thought about the subscription problem some and have ideas but it's outside of the scope of my current project, but I think it is a solvable problem with some underlying changes to token mechanics.
- verdverm 5y agoSounds more like the NFT is a ticket for entry to an experience. How does this work if a person makes a unique wallet for this NFT and then shares the private key? Does that essentially break the exclusivity mechanics?
- shiohime 5y agoYeah, that is how I am envisioning it as well. It is a ticket to services I've already created, and services I intend to create in the future. And sure, a user could create a shared wallet and let others see the interactive capabilities of the art in that wallet. Personally I wouldn't mind if someone wanted to do this, my collection will have X number of unique pieces, each of them are a completely different generative piece. So, yeah, you could buy a piece, put it in a shared wallet, and share it with your friends. Up to the purchasers of the piece to do what they want with it :)