3 ms·
All of this could be true if the test had zero, or even negative, value in measuring the ability to learn & desire to excel. Picking any test, and curating for
by sirspacey 5y ago
All of this could be true if the test had zero, or even negative, value in measuring the ability to learn & desire to excel.
Picking any test, and curating for those willing to and capable of the work required to pass it, would create this result.
That’s the problem with this justification. It doesn’t have a functional limit.
“DIY University” covered the history of how this mechanic brought down the Ming dynasty in just a couple generations.
Tests can always be justified by non-causal correlation.
Assessments ARE the reason why validated methods of learning, like project based learning, are not widely adopted.
We have copious amounts of evidence now that teaching to the test is both psychologically harmful & reduces the ability to learn.
We will not change our education system until assessments are dethroned.
The movement to end assessment is our only hope as a society to stop teaching children based on archaic & wrong ideas about how we learn & develop work ethic. It is a significant factor in why a generation is experiencing alarmingly destructive levels of anxiety on a daily basis.
We all have a lot to gain by building education programs where students demonstrate what they learn.
Tests are the worst possible option.
Check out “Most Likely To Succeed” for powerful alternatives.
- achillesheels 5y agoHow does one examine the retention of memory in the individual? I agree with the exclusive entrances in regards to exams, but how does one demonstrate knowledge of necessary concepts in order to show one is eligible for progressing in the learning? Tests are a form of qualification. One may have the desire but, if one does not have the aptitude to retain abstract intellectual ideas, how does it benefit anyone for one to be participating in the progress of human knowledge?