3 ms·
You are getting it backwards. There are two flimsy arguments for machine intelligence from Hunter and Brooks. The paper is poking holes in that.
by cscurmudgeon 5y ago
You are getting it backwards.
There are two flimsy arguments for machine intelligence from Hunter and Brooks. The paper is poking holes in that.
- mcguire 5y agoIt's not doing a very good job.
- cscurmudgeon 5y agoIt is doing a job as good as the original arguments.
- jmull 5y agoThat’s not an accurate characterization. E.g., they address Brook’s definition of basic arthropod intelligence, and are positive about it. > We then summarise the highly useful definition of basic (arthropod) intelligence proposed by Rodney Brooks