13 ms·

Show HN: Cleanvoice – Automated Podcast Editing

221 points by autoencoders 5y ago

nateweiss 5y ago
Looks cool! Would this also work for "explainer" type videos, showing how to use a software product or similar? If yes, you might consider a page or callout about that use-case, as it might attract some additional users. Just a thought.
- tyingq 5y ago
  That seems like it would be tricky, as the video and audio would get out of sync. You would have to remove, then "fill" to keep the timing. Though this product does mention it works with multiple speakers on different tracks...so they are already somewhat in that space.
  - autoencoders 5y ago
    For video is quite tricky. One thing with Video is that you don't want to over edit the audio, since its then very hard to keep the video synced. That said for explainer video it should work ok, but for a Video Podcast it would be horrible. I have an idea how to deal with this, but this is not now available.
autoencoders 5y ago
Hey HN! I like podcasting, but I hate editing them. I tend to stutter and have a lot of filler words in my podcast. That's why I created Cleanvoice, in order to spend less time editing them. Cleanvoice is an ML tool which removes filler words, mouth sounds, stuttering and dead air from your podcast. To use it, just upload your podcast - wait some minutes - download the cleaned audio. It's still not perfect, but it's at a stage where I can blindly use it on every single one of my podcast. I would love to hear your feedback!
- qmmmur 5y ago
  Without giving away your secret sauce, what are your approaches to the cleaning process? Is it a combination of different passes of algos or is it something more generic and "sausage machine-like" like a neural network?
  - autoencoders 5y ago
    The audio is edited in several phases. It uses different algorithms, but most of them are deep learning based. It is surely overengineered, but as a Data Scientist, ML is the most fun part for me.
    - qmmmur 5y ago
      Do you do any audio segmentation to remove the filler words and such?
    - nmstoker 5y ago
      How is the latency and, if it's sufficiently low, could this realistically be applied to "nearly live" content? That scenario seems really appealing for conferences, even if it just quietens down the verbal ticks, but I'm guessing if the lag is too great it would get like a bad lip sync issue
      - autoencoders 5y ago
        It would be a huge engineering endeavour, which I wouldn't be capable of doing. That said, things like background noise and some sounds can be removed. See Krisp.ai
      - qmmmur 5y ago
        Izotope plugins already do some of these things but not all. In particular their de-clicking algorithm is pretty good but definitely not automatic or low latency.
      - Fogest 5y ago
        Nvidia RTX voice does similar. It's pretty similar to other technology though where it focuses more on removing background noise. It actually works very well. It would definitely be interesting to see it also filter speech itself. But I feel like this would be hard to do without introducing extra latency. If someone is saying "umm" or some other filler before a word you kinda need to know what that word will be to determine if it's filler or not. So it almost can't be done without introducing latency as it would need some future speech to determine if filler or not.
gus_massa 5y ago
Is the example in the page really made by the computer? In my opinion the pauses in where the filler words were are slightly too long. Is it possible to configure this? Is it possible to keep some filler words? I make something similar (but not professionally), and sometimes I like too keep a few of them.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  > Is the example in the page really made by the computer? Yes. >In my opinion the pauses in where the filler words were are slightly too long. Is it possible to configure this? I agree, however, if you use it in an interview. The edits sound better. In an unnatural setting, you get unnatural results. Currently, there is no way to set it for now. But customization is planned for Q2 next year. >Is it possible to keep some filler words? For now no, but keeping some filler sounds to keep it authentic is something which I plan.
  - gus_massa 5y ago
    I agree that the correct length of the pause after the word is removed is very tricky. Perhaps your configuration is the better than my imaginary magical edition. In other comment, eganist posted a link to https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations It looks interesting because I can choose which to keep and even use it to sink with video [with some additional work]. I didn't see it the first time in the page.
    - autoencoders 5y ago
      ADL Support is also around Q2, so you could just import it in your audio/video editor without issue. Thank you point out. I'll put Integrations on the homepage as well.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
eganist 5y ago
This is awesome. Can I suggest the ability to export as project files for popular editors for your roadmap? It'd cut professional workflows down substantially, which would be worth an (even higher) upcharge. (It wasn't immediately obvious to me if you already did this) Edit: https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations seems pretty close. I'd honestly charge more for integrations and provide a base tier for just exporting sound. I imagine most indie users would benefit from finished exports enough to pay, while project files would command a higher fee from editors looking to speed up their workflow to take more clients. That's where I'm coming from on pricing tiers and upcharging for professional features.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  ADL Support will come around Q2, so you can import it in lot of audio and video editors. For now, we have these export files which you mentioned. Regarding Pricing, that's a good point. I will definitely consider it, thank you!
- tim-- 5y ago
  To add to this, it might also be a good feature to output EDL files for video editors. https://www.rev.com/blog/how-to-import-an-edit-decision-list-edl-into-davinci-resolve https://www.rev.com/blog/how-to-import-an-edit-decision-list... This could help when you have for example multiple camera angles, to switch between/do morph cuts (https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/morph-cut.html https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/morph-cut.html) for video interviews.
  - autoencoders 5y ago
    Thank you for the suggestion. EDL/ADL is definitely on the list.
daenney 5y ago
The Terms of service seem worrisome. > By posting your Contributions to any part of the Site or making Contributions accessible to the Site by linking your account from the Site to any of your social networking accounts, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to us an unrestricted, unlimited, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, fully-paid, worldwide right, and license to host, use, copy, reproduce, disclose, sell, resell, publish, broadcast, retitle, archive, store, cache, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, transmit, excerpt (in whole or in part), and distribute such Contributions (including, without limitation, your image and voice) for any purpose, commercial, advertising, or otherwise, and to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such Contributions, and grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing. It sounds an awful lot like "we are allowed to do anything and everything we want with the content you upload to us". Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but I'd be extremely hesitant to upload any content I create to a service with those kinds of terms.
- 1-6 5y ago
  Thanks for the heads up. I’m a little hesitant to upload something now. On the flip-side, I think devs just want total protection while they navigate the landscape of machine learning. I agree that they could have worded things better but someone who worked on writing this probably didn’t understand the nuances of machine learning or the countries that people would be signing up from. Plus they’ll need to constantly use datasets for their internal purposes to train.
  - autoencoders 5y ago
    Yes, that's exactly the case. As I previously commented, I used an terms generator, until I get a lawyer, which can write specifically what I do with the data.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  I agree. The terms will be changed. I used an auto-generated Terms generator for now (termly.io) I would like to rewrite it. What I do is just keep your files on the server for a week. In case you have an issue, I will look into your file to fix your issue. And if you want, you can give consent for me to further improve the service. (Say you have an accent which the AI is bad and I can use your audio file to understand why it failed.)
axhl 5y ago
Congratulations on launching. How are you finding using termly.io for the legal side of things?
- autoencoders 5y ago
  It's not ideal. See the comment talking about the terms. I have a meeting with a lawyer soon. But I guess is better than no terms.
fareesh 5y ago
What's the high level approach required to build something like this yourself? Does it involve relying on speech to text with timestamps and then a series of cuts based on that?
spicybright 5y ago
I'm going to sound like a negative nancey, but I wish podcasters/youtubers would just practice their speaking skills instead of rely on series of really quick jump cuts. Worst offenders are those that can't get through a sentence without splicing it 2+ times... Perhaps you could have a mode to detect how much one stutters, and parts worth redoing without spending as much time combing the whole thing.
- cube00 5y ago
  Especially ones who won't set their background LED lights to a stable color. The smooth flowing gradient becomes very distracting when you jump cut the heck out of it.
  - intrasight 5y ago
    synesthesia?
- curiousgal 5y ago
  Once I started noticing jumpcuts it ruined every single YouTube video with a person talking into the camera. The worst offender being Phillip DeFranco.
  - ghaff 5y ago
    I find talking into a camera really tough. If you're doing it by yourself you almost need to imagine you're talking to a person. I even know of people who put cutouts or pictures of someone by the camera so they can talk to a person. I haven't had a lot of luck using teleprompters but maybe I just haven't hit of the right setup. Something else someone told me recently was to try to work in short segments that you redo until you get right and then do a cut to the next segment somewhere that it's natural.
  - unholiness 5y ago
    Interesting take. I saw Phillip DeFranco as more of a pioneer of that style. He really leaned into the cuts. At the time it was something no one else was doing so it was very noticeable, and he had a very crisp cadence with them where the jarring cuts were part of the presentation. It was clear his process was: Write a script, mark cuts everywhere it could make sense, go through the script repeating every phrase until you're happy with the sound, and when editing, always make the cuts where they're marked, even if it could be skipped. The result feels something like pixel art: Clearly not the closest possible imitation of conversational speaking, but something else. A style in its own right with different considerations. Now that it's par for the course to have jump cuts, I see them used more sloppily everywhere, where it's clear the narrator decided where to do the cuts after the fact. Cutting off the beginning or end of a phoneme, missing or repeating bits of a thought because they they liked one phrasing in recording but opted for another one in post, misordered cuts where something which moved in the background moves back to its old place, etc. Phillip's style looked lazy but it can't really be imitated with actual laziness. These days I look back and really cringe at the substance of his show. But I still see the style as professional.
notafraudster 5y ago
"Free 30 Minutes Trial" is not native English. "Free 30 Minute Trial" would be better; but I think the sentence is a little confusing. I presume you mean you can convert 30 minutes of audio for free, not that the trial account is only valid for 30 minutes from creation. I would do "Clean 30 minutes of audio for free. No Credit Card needed." or similar. The sale page which says "Get 30 minutes credit to try the service out." is better, and "30 minutes" does sound correct on that page. In your FAQ, you say: "Currently we remove lip smacks, saliva crackle, mouth clicks and harsh parts of breathing (not the whole breath). If you want to remove a particular mouth sound (ex. Chewing), write us in the chat as a feature request." I don't think most English speakers would understand what "harsh parts of breathing" are. Typically a parenthetical example in English would be written "(e.g. chewing)" not "(ex. Chewing")". Your question "What filetype and sizes do you support?" doesn't answer what filetypes you support, and I suspect the singular "filetype" was a grammar error. You also write "We have an audio file size limit of 1.5G per file or in case you are uploading multi-track and a total file size of 2 GB. ". The part that says "or in case you are uploading multi-track and" doesn't make any sense in English. I think you mean "We support file sizes up to 1.5GB per file for single-track files, or 2GB if you are uploading a multi-track file as separate files." but I'm not sure. In general I don't understand why each selling point has a separate FAQ page but the FAQs are often not related to the selling point. I don't think people think the "Mouth Sound Remover" page is the one that lists file size support, while the "Stutter Remover" page is the one that lists the maximum number of tracks per project. Your integrations page lowercases "cleanvoice" whereas other pages write it as "Cleanvoice". Under integrations, you have a section called "Markers Export". This should probably be "Export Markers" or "Marker Export". Under "How to Export Edits", you probably don't want to capitalize "Results" or "Editor" unless these are supposed to be title cased, in which case you probably want to title case all of them. Under your pricing FAQ you have "Does my credit expire at end of the month? Your credit will reset every billing month. Unused credit will be lost." This is needlessly confusing. You use the verbs "expire", "reset", and "be lost" to describe the same thing, and you don't actually answer the question. Also you don't want "at end of the month", you want "at month's end" or "at the end of the month". I would rewrite as "Does my credit expire at the end of each month? Yes. Credit resets every month and cannot be carried over to future months. Unused credit will be lost." This is a terrible business model, though, and so I suggest you not do this. Either sell as a subscription or sell as a credit model, not both, this is gross. In general I think you want to pay someone who is a professional English copywriter to fix your website. Cheers. Edit: I just noticed your changelog is powered by a service called Headway. I am not sure if you also made Headway, but Headway's website is also in need of English copyediting.
hs86 5y ago
Reminds me of https://auphonic.com/ https://auphonic.com/ Their pricing is also similar, but Auphonic allows both subscription and prepaid "credits".
- autoencoders 5y ago
  Yes, the idea is to bring also prepaid credits soon. Auphonic and Cleanvoice go well together. I guess the idea is to have your podcast edited by Cleanvoice and then the audio post-processing with Auphonic.
  - ghaff 5y ago
    Auphonic's volume equalization is almost a must-have for podcasts. I used to spend a lot of time getting volumes right. With Auphonic it's quick and easy. I definitely prefer pre-paid credits to a subscription given my podcast production varies a lot.
throwaway1777 5y ago
Overcast has features to do some of this on the listener side. I prefer having the AI on the listener side so I can go back to the raw version if the AI messes up for some reason.
geuis 5y ago
Your demos don’t play on iOS safari.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  Ups! Thank you for point it that out. I'll check it.
monroewalker 5y ago
Sounds similar to Descript https://www.descript.com/ https://www.descript.com/
- erichdongubler 5y ago
  I'm a very happy user of the free tier of Descript right now, and will definitely pay once my transcription limit is reached. It seems like this particular product might do a better job of the automated editing specifically, but Descript has a ton of other features (speaker identification, transcription, real-time editing based on text edits, asset management, and uploads), and I definitely wouldn't trade them for marginally better auto-removal of noise and filler. Does anybody who develops Cleanvoice have any commentary here?
  - autoencoders 5y ago
    Adrian from Cleanvoice here. Before building Cleanvoice, I tried to use Descript for my podcasts. 1) It doesn't work well if you have a strong accent. As an non-native speaker, the transcription were quite bad, making the editing quite bad. 2) Cleanvoice works with multiple languages, descript doesn't. 3) Cleanvoice can remove stutters (not always, but it tries) and mouth sounds like lip smacking, teeth clicking. Descript can't. This is not a big deal for most, but since I stutter alot this was essential. However, if none of these apply for you. There is no reason to change from Descript.
xipho 5y ago
Can anyone recommend similar for removing ums etc. in videos? IIRC there is a workflow in some professional software, but being able to train and throw the algorithim right at the video itself (especially locally) would be useful.
- mijustin 5y ago
  Yes; Descript.com does this.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  For now, Descript would be the best option. You can still make it work with the integrations, but it is a lot of effort. That will change in Q2, when I add support for video.
- nickjj 5y ago
  > Can anyone recommend similar for removing ums etc. in videos? For single camera floating head style videos where you're continuously talking about 1 topic it's going to be very jarring if you start cutting out filler words. You'll end up with a bunch of jump cuts where it looks like video frames are dropped.
mijustin 5y ago
Hey! Justin (from Transistor.fm) here. This looks really interesting. Two questions: 1. Any plans for an API and bulk pricing? 2. Any plans to add loudness normalization, balancing, etc to the processing?
- autoencoders 5y ago
  Hey Justin! Love your podcast. 1) API Access will come end of Q1. 2) In the next 6 months, No. However, Auphonic would be a good fit for you.
- bozhark 5y ago
  So my current podcast stack looks like Zencastr RECORD Transistor.fm HOST but looks like I'll be adding Cleanvoice AI CLEAN UP Auphonic AI EQ any other suggestions for optimum output from multiple inputs all over the world?
mikepechadotcom 5y ago
Really cool project, I wish you great success! Could be useful for my (german) podcast agency! Out of curiosity: Which ai-technology did you use? OpenAI? Google API? Or did you train the models yourself with Python (sth. like Tensorflow)? Cheers, Mike
- autoencoders 5y ago
  Hallo Mike, freut mich dich kennenzulernen! I trained my own models. No OpenAI/Google API. Liebe Grüße, Adrian
stavros 5y ago
This is excellent, well done! I'd be curious to know how it's done, as I don't know much about deep learning and this looks like magic to me.
abdik 5y ago
The logo is similar to ours https://www.lovo.ai/ https://www.lovo.ai/
- bryans 5y ago
  While turning it into a heart may be clever branding, you've only slightly modified a ubiquitous icon representing audio, and countless startups used that before you.
arendtio 5y ago
That logo is very similar to the Cisco logo: https://www.cisco.com https://www.cisco.com
pwned1 5y ago
I suspected something like this was happening with podcasts. I've noticed lately that some podcasters have unnaturally short pauses between speakers (question and answer) or between sentences. It really annoys me. It makes it almost unlistenable.
- carols10cents 5y ago
  Yes, the worst is when so much silence is removed that it sounds like someone is laughing over themselves.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  I agree, as if they don't breathe! This is not the case with my app. I keep the edits longer than shorter, since I also find that unlistenable.
sdoering 5y ago
Not sure were you are located, but if you are giving access to people protected by the GDPR your cookie notice does not fullfill the requirements set by European Regulations. Additionally, if you are located in a country that (like Germany for example) has regulations on the necessity of an imprint, this might also be missing.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  It should be ok, since I use strictly essential cookies, which don't require consent. (But users need to be informed) Or do I misunderstand the law? [1] Strictly necessary cookies — These cookies are essential for you to browse the website and use its features, such as accessing secure areas of the site. Cookies that allow web shops to hold your items in your cart while you are shopping online are an example of strictly necessary cookies. These cookies will generally be first-party session cookies. While it is not required to obtain consent for these cookies, what they do and why they are necessary should be explained to the user. [1] - https://gdpr.eu/cookies/ https://gdpr.eu/cookies/
nickjj 5y ago
As someone who has personally edited over a hundred 1-2 hour podcasts with a new guest every time removing umms, ahhs, dead air and filler words is soul crushing. It has gotten to the point where after 2 years of running my podcast[0] I'm seriously considering stopping the show because I'm getting burnt out from editing and without sponsors it's not feasible to hire an editor, but even with the show making no money I would happily pay triple your asking price if I could click a button and have the problem solved in a way that matched a human's ability to edit out filler words. It really is the difference between being able to edit a 1 hour episode in 1 real life hour (editing at 2x speed) vs literally spending 5 hours to edit 1 hour when there's a lot of filler words or ums. That's due to having to stop every few seconds, think about when to cut it and perform the cut. This is using a heavily optimized keyboard shortcut focused workflow too. I hope you don't mind constructive criticism but in my opinion your "after" version doesn't sound natural. This isn't an attack on your service specifically, because the outcome is the same with all of the automated tools I've tried. I haven't tried them all but I did play with a few of them. For example in your case the pause between "Removing" and "filler" doesn't match the pace of the rest of the sentence and the transition from "very" to "time" has a very hard cut. This is also a 10 word clip that's about 6 seconds. If you listened to a 1 hour podcast episode that was edited like this it would be much more noticeable. There's so many intricate and subtle details around when and what to cut to remove these things in a way where it's not noticeable. Are there any paths moving forward in AI / ML that can lead to this being indistinguishable from being humanly edited? I debated deleting this comment before posting it because it's a combination of feedback but also saying the service isn't something I would buy in its current state but I'd like to think it's more beneficial to post this to show there is a real demand for this service if it can be executed flawlessly. [0]: https://runninginproduction.com/ https://runninginproduction.com/
- autoencoders 5y ago
  The edit on the page is not the best. I agree!. Mainly, if your recording is unnatural (like that one) the edit is also unnatural. However, the tool works better in an interview podcast. I would strongly recommend to just upload a sample, and you would see a big difference. Regarding if ML would be indistinguishable from humanly edit. Hard to tell. I think it will be like self-driving cars in the future. 98% edits good 2% bad edits.
tokamak-teapot 5y ago
“The algorithm can also work with accents from other countries, such as Australian ones or Irish.” Other than which country, though? Presumably an English speaking one - UK? New Zealand? Canada? US?

221 points by autoencoders 5y ago

Looks cool! Would this also work for "explainer" type videos, showing how to use a software product or similar? If yes, you might consider a page or callout about that use-case, as it might attract some additional users. Just a thought.

tyingq 5y ago
That seems like it would be tricky, as the video and audio would get out of sync. You would have to remove, then "fill" to keep the timing. Though this product does mention it works with multiple speakers on different tracks...so they are already somewhat in that space.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  For video is quite tricky. One thing with Video is that you don't want to over edit the audio, since its then very hard to keep the video synced. That said for explainer video it should work ok, but for a Video Podcast it would be horrible. I have an idea how to deal with this, but this is not now available.

autoencoders 5y ago

Hey HN! I like podcasting, but I hate editing them. I tend to stutter and have a lot of filler words in my podcast. That's why I created Cleanvoice, in order to spend less time editing them. Cleanvoice is an ML tool which removes filler words, mouth sounds, stuttering and dead air from your podcast. To use it, just upload your podcast - wait some minutes - download the cleaned audio. It's still not perfect, but it's at a stage where I can blindly use it on every single one of my podcast. I would love to hear your feedback!

qmmmur 5y ago
Without giving away your secret sauce, what are your approaches to the cleaning process? Is it a combination of different passes of algos or is it something more generic and "sausage machine-like" like a neural network?
- autoencoders 5y ago
  The audio is edited in several phases. It uses different algorithms, but most of them are deep learning based. It is surely overengineered, but as a Data Scientist, ML is the most fun part for me.
  - qmmmur 5y ago
    Do you do any audio segmentation to remove the filler words and such?
  - nmstoker 5y ago
    How is the latency and, if it's sufficiently low, could this realistically be applied to "nearly live" content? That scenario seems really appealing for conferences, even if it just quietens down the verbal ticks, but I'm guessing if the lag is too great it would get like a bad lip sync issue
    - autoencoders 5y ago
      It would be a huge engineering endeavour, which I wouldn't be capable of doing. That said, things like background noise and some sounds can be removed. See Krisp.ai
    - qmmmur 5y ago
      Izotope plugins already do some of these things but not all. In particular their de-clicking algorithm is pretty good but definitely not automatic or low latency.
    - Fogest 5y ago
      Nvidia RTX voice does similar. It's pretty similar to other technology though where it focuses more on removing background noise. It actually works very well. It would definitely be interesting to see it also filter speech itself. But I feel like this would be hard to do without introducing extra latency. If someone is saying "umm" or some other filler before a word you kinda need to know what that word will be to determine if it's filler or not. So it almost can't be done without introducing latency as it would need some future speech to determine if filler or not.

gus_massa 5y ago

Is the example in the page really made by the computer? In my opinion the pauses in where the filler words were are slightly too long. Is it possible to configure this? Is it possible to keep some filler words? I make something similar (but not professionally), and sometimes I like too keep a few of them.

autoencoders 5y ago
> Is the example in the page really made by the computer? Yes. >In my opinion the pauses in where the filler words were are slightly too long. Is it possible to configure this? I agree, however, if you use it in an interview. The edits sound better. In an unnatural setting, you get unnatural results. Currently, there is no way to set it for now. But customization is planned for Q2 next year. >Is it possible to keep some filler words? For now no, but keeping some filler sounds to keep it authentic is something which I plan.
- gus_massa 5y ago
  I agree that the correct length of the pause after the word is removed is very tricky. Perhaps your configuration is the better than my imaginary magical edition. In other comment, eganist posted a link to https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations It looks interesting because I can choose which to keep and even use it to sink with video [with some additional work]. I didn't see it the first time in the page.
  - autoencoders 5y ago
    ADL Support is also around Q2, so you could just import it in your audio/video editor without issue. Thank you point out. I'll put Integrations on the homepage as well.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

eganist 5y ago

This is awesome. Can I suggest the ability to export as project files for popular editors for your roadmap? It'd cut professional workflows down substantially, which would be worth an (even higher) upcharge. (It wasn't immediately obvious to me if you already did this) Edit: https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations https://cleanvoice.ai/integrations seems pretty close. I'd honestly charge more for integrations and provide a base tier for just exporting sound. I imagine most indie users would benefit from finished exports enough to pay, while project files would command a higher fee from editors looking to speed up their workflow to take more clients. That's where I'm coming from on pricing tiers and upcharging for professional features.

autoencoders 5y ago
ADL Support will come around Q2, so you can import it in lot of audio and video editors. For now, we have these export files which you mentioned. Regarding Pricing, that's a good point. I will definitely consider it, thank you!
tim-- 5y ago
To add to this, it might also be a good feature to output EDL files for video editors. https://www.rev.com/blog/how-to-import-an-edit-decision-list-edl-into-davinci-resolve https://www.rev.com/blog/how-to-import-an-edit-decision-list... This could help when you have for example multiple camera angles, to switch between/do morph cuts (https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/morph-cut.html https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/morph-cut.html) for video interviews.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  Thank you for the suggestion. EDL/ADL is definitely on the list.

daenney 5y ago

The Terms of service seem worrisome. > By posting your Contributions to any part of the Site or making Contributions accessible to the Site by linking your account from the Site to any of your social networking accounts, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to us an unrestricted, unlimited, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, fully-paid, worldwide right, and license to host, use, copy, reproduce, disclose, sell, resell, publish, broadcast, retitle, archive, store, cache, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, transmit, excerpt (in whole or in part), and distribute such Contributions (including, without limitation, your image and voice) for any purpose, commercial, advertising, or otherwise, and to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such Contributions, and grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing. It sounds an awful lot like "we are allowed to do anything and everything we want with the content you upload to us". Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but I'd be extremely hesitant to upload any content I create to a service with those kinds of terms.

1-6 5y ago
Thanks for the heads up. I’m a little hesitant to upload something now. On the flip-side, I think devs just want total protection while they navigate the landscape of machine learning. I agree that they could have worded things better but someone who worked on writing this probably didn’t understand the nuances of machine learning or the countries that people would be signing up from. Plus they’ll need to constantly use datasets for their internal purposes to train.
- autoencoders 5y ago
  Yes, that's exactly the case. As I previously commented, I used an terms generator, until I get a lawyer, which can write specifically what I do with the data.
autoencoders 5y ago
I agree. The terms will be changed. I used an auto-generated Terms generator for now (termly.io) I would like to rewrite it. What I do is just keep your files on the server for a week. In case you have an issue, I will look into your file to fix your issue. And if you want, you can give consent for me to further improve the service. (Say you have an accent which the AI is bad and I can use your audio file to understand why it failed.)

axhl 5y ago

Congratulations on launching. How are you finding using termly.io for the legal side of things?

autoencoders 5y ago
It's not ideal. See the comment talking about the terms. I have a meeting with a lawyer soon. But I guess is better than no terms.

fareesh 5y ago

What's the high level approach required to build something like this yourself? Does it involve relying on speech to text with timestamps and then a series of cuts based on that?

spicybright 5y ago

I'm going to sound like a negative nancey, but I wish podcasters/youtubers would just practice their speaking skills instead of rely on series of really quick jump cuts. Worst offenders are those that can't get through a sentence without splicing it 2+ times... Perhaps you could have a mode to detect how much one stutters, and parts worth redoing without spending as much time combing the whole thing.

cube00 5y ago
Especially ones who won't set their background LED lights to a stable color. The smooth flowing gradient becomes very distracting when you jump cut the heck out of it.
- intrasight 5y ago
  synesthesia?
curiousgal 5y ago
Once I started noticing jumpcuts it ruined every single YouTube video with a person talking into the camera. The worst offender being Phillip DeFranco.
- ghaff 5y ago
  I find talking into a camera really tough. If you're doing it by yourself you almost need to imagine you're talking to a person. I even know of people who put cutouts or pictures of someone by the camera so they can talk to a person. I haven't had a lot of luck using teleprompters but maybe I just haven't hit of the right setup. Something else someone told me recently was to try to work in short segments that you redo until you get right and then do a cut to the next segment somewhere that it's natural.
- unholiness 5y ago
  Interesting take. I saw Phillip DeFranco as more of a pioneer of that style. He really leaned into the cuts. At the time it was something no one else was doing so it was very noticeable, and he had a very crisp cadence with them where the jarring cuts were part of the presentation. It was clear his process was: Write a script, mark cuts everywhere it could make sense, go through the script repeating every phrase until you're happy with the sound, and when editing, always make the cuts where they're marked, even if it could be skipped. The result feels something like pixel art: Clearly not the closest possible imitation of conversational speaking, but something else. A style in its own right with different considerations. Now that it's par for the course to have jump cuts, I see them used more sloppily everywhere, where it's clear the narrator decided where to do the cuts after the fact. Cutting off the beginning or end of a phoneme, missing or repeating bits of a thought because they they liked one phrasing in recording but opted for another one in post, misordered cuts where something which moved in the background moves back to its old place, etc. Phillip's style looked lazy but it can't really be imitated with actual laziness. These days I look back and really cringe at the substance of his show. But I still see the style as professional.

notafraudster 5y ago

"Free 30 Minutes Trial" is not native English. "Free 30 Minute Trial" would be better; but I think the sentence is a little confusing. I presume you mean you can convert 30 minutes of audio for free, not that the trial account is only valid for 30 minutes from creation. I would do "Clean 30 minutes of audio for free. No Credit Card needed." or similar. The sale page which says "Get 30 minutes credit to try the service out." is better, and "30 minutes" does sound correct on that page. In your FAQ, you say: "Currently we remove lip smacks, saliva crackle, mouth clicks and harsh parts of breathing (not the whole breath). If you want to remove a particular mouth sound (ex. Chewing), write us in the chat as a feature request." I don't think most English speakers would understand what "harsh parts of breathing" are. Typically a parenthetical example in English would be written "(e.g. chewing)" not "(ex. Chewing")". Your question "What filetype and sizes do you support?" doesn't answer what filetypes you support, and I suspect the singular "filetype" was a grammar error. You also write "We have an audio file size limit of 1.5G per file or in case you are uploading multi-track and a total file size of 2 GB. ". The part that says "or in case you are uploading multi-track and" doesn't make any sense in English. I think you mean "We support file sizes up to 1.5GB per file for single-track files, or 2GB if you are uploading a multi-track file as separate files." but I'm not sure. In general I don't understand why each selling point has a separate FAQ page but the FAQs are often not related to the selling point. I don't think people think the "Mouth Sound Remover" page is the one that lists file size support, while the "Stutter Remover" page is the one that lists the maximum number of tracks per project. Your integrations page lowercases "cleanvoice" whereas other pages write it as "Cleanvoice". Under integrations, you have a section called "Markers Export". This should probably be "Export Markers" or "Marker Export". Under "How to Export Edits", you probably don't want to capitalize "Results" or "Editor" unless these are supposed to be title cased, in which case you probably want to title case all of them. Under your pricing FAQ you have "Does my credit expire at end of the month? Your credit will reset every billing month. Unused credit will be lost." This is needlessly confusing. You use the verbs "expire", "reset", and "be lost" to describe the same thing, and you don't actually answer the question. Also you don't want "at end of the month", you want "at month's end" or "at the end of the month". I would rewrite as "Does my credit expire at the end of each month? Yes. Credit resets every month and cannot be carried over to future months. Unused credit will be lost." This is a terrible business model, though, and so I suggest you not do this. Either sell as a subscription or sell as a credit model, not both, this is gross. In general I think you want to pay someone who is a professional English copywriter to fix your website. Cheers. Edit: I just noticed your changelog is powered by a service called Headway. I am not sure if you also made Headway, but Headway's website is also in need of English copyediting.

hs86 5y ago

Reminds me of https://auphonic.com/ https://auphonic.com/ Their pricing is also similar, but Auphonic allows both subscription and prepaid "credits".

autoencoders 5y ago
Yes, the idea is to bring also prepaid credits soon. Auphonic and Cleanvoice go well together. I guess the idea is to have your podcast edited by Cleanvoice and then the audio post-processing with Auphonic.
- ghaff 5y ago
  Auphonic's volume equalization is almost a must-have for podcasts. I used to spend a lot of time getting volumes right. With Auphonic it's quick and easy. I definitely prefer pre-paid credits to a subscription given my podcast production varies a lot.

throwaway1777 5y ago

Overcast has features to do some of this on the listener side. I prefer having the AI on the listener side so I can go back to the raw version if the AI messes up for some reason.

geuis 5y ago

Your demos don’t play on iOS safari.

autoencoders 5y ago
Ups! Thank you for point it that out. I'll check it.

monroewalker 5y ago

Sounds similar to Descript https://www.descript.com/ https://www.descript.com/

erichdongubler 5y ago
I'm a very happy user of the free tier of Descript right now, and will definitely pay once my transcription limit is reached. It seems like this particular product might do a better job of the automated editing specifically, but Descript has a ton of other features (speaker identification, transcription, real-time editing based on text edits, asset management, and uploads), and I definitely wouldn't trade them for marginally better auto-removal of noise and filler. Does anybody who develops Cleanvoice have any commentary here?
- autoencoders 5y ago
  Adrian from Cleanvoice here. Before building Cleanvoice, I tried to use Descript for my podcasts. 1) It doesn't work well if you have a strong accent. As an non-native speaker, the transcription were quite bad, making the editing quite bad. 2) Cleanvoice works with multiple languages, descript doesn't. 3) Cleanvoice can remove stutters (not always, but it tries) and mouth sounds like lip smacking, teeth clicking. Descript can't. This is not a big deal for most, but since I stutter alot this was essential. However, if none of these apply for you. There is no reason to change from Descript.

xipho 5y ago

Can anyone recommend similar for removing ums etc. in videos? IIRC there is a workflow in some professional software, but being able to train and throw the algorithim right at the video itself (especially locally) would be useful.

mijustin 5y ago
Yes; Descript.com does this.
autoencoders 5y ago
For now, Descript would be the best option. You can still make it work with the integrations, but it is a lot of effort. That will change in Q2, when I add support for video.
nickjj 5y ago
> Can anyone recommend similar for removing ums etc. in videos? For single camera floating head style videos where you're continuously talking about 1 topic it's going to be very jarring if you start cutting out filler words. You'll end up with a bunch of jump cuts where it looks like video frames are dropped.

mijustin 5y ago

Hey! Justin (from Transistor.fm) here. This looks really interesting. Two questions: 1. Any plans for an API and bulk pricing? 2. Any plans to add loudness normalization, balancing, etc to the processing?

autoencoders 5y ago
Hey Justin! Love your podcast. 1) API Access will come end of Q1. 2) In the next 6 months, No. However, Auphonic would be a good fit for you.
bozhark 5y ago
So my current podcast stack looks like Zencastr RECORD Transistor.fm HOST but looks like I'll be adding Cleanvoice AI CLEAN UP Auphonic AI EQ any other suggestions for optimum output from multiple inputs all over the world?

mikepechadotcom 5y ago

Really cool project, I wish you great success! Could be useful for my (german) podcast agency! Out of curiosity: Which ai-technology did you use? OpenAI? Google API? Or did you train the models yourself with Python (sth. like Tensorflow)? Cheers, Mike

autoencoders 5y ago
Hallo Mike, freut mich dich kennenzulernen! I trained my own models. No OpenAI/Google API. Liebe Grüße, Adrian

stavros 5y ago

This is excellent, well done! I'd be curious to know how it's done, as I don't know much about deep learning and this looks like magic to me.

abdik 5y ago

The logo is similar to ours https://www.lovo.ai/ https://www.lovo.ai/

bryans 5y ago
While turning it into a heart may be clever branding, you've only slightly modified a ubiquitous icon representing audio, and countless startups used that before you.

arendtio 5y ago

That logo is very similar to the Cisco logo: https://www.cisco.com https://www.cisco.com

pwned1 5y ago

I suspected something like this was happening with podcasts. I've noticed lately that some podcasters have unnaturally short pauses between speakers (question and answer) or between sentences. It really annoys me. It makes it almost unlistenable.

carols10cents 5y ago
Yes, the worst is when so much silence is removed that it sounds like someone is laughing over themselves.
autoencoders 5y ago
I agree, as if they don't breathe! This is not the case with my app. I keep the edits longer than shorter, since I also find that unlistenable.

sdoering 5y ago

Not sure were you are located, but if you are giving access to people protected by the GDPR your cookie notice does not fullfill the requirements set by European Regulations. Additionally, if you are located in a country that (like Germany for example) has regulations on the necessity of an imprint, this might also be missing.

autoencoders 5y ago
It should be ok, since I use strictly essential cookies, which don't require consent. (But users need to be informed) Or do I misunderstand the law? [1] Strictly necessary cookies — These cookies are essential for you to browse the website and use its features, such as accessing secure areas of the site. Cookies that allow web shops to hold your items in your cart while you are shopping online are an example of strictly necessary cookies. These cookies will generally be first-party session cookies. While it is not required to obtain consent for these cookies, what they do and why they are necessary should be explained to the user. [1] - https://gdpr.eu/cookies/ https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

nickjj 5y ago

As someone who has personally edited over a hundred 1-2 hour podcasts with a new guest every time removing umms, ahhs, dead air and filler words is soul crushing. It has gotten to the point where after 2 years of running my podcast[0] I'm seriously considering stopping the show because I'm getting burnt out from editing and without sponsors it's not feasible to hire an editor, but even with the show making no money I would happily pay triple your asking price if I could click a button and have the problem solved in a way that matched a human's ability to edit out filler words. It really is the difference between being able to edit a 1 hour episode in 1 real life hour (editing at 2x speed) vs literally spending 5 hours to edit 1 hour when there's a lot of filler words or ums. That's due to having to stop every few seconds, think about when to cut it and perform the cut. This is using a heavily optimized keyboard shortcut focused workflow too. I hope you don't mind constructive criticism but in my opinion your "after" version doesn't sound natural. This isn't an attack on your service specifically, because the outcome is the same with all of the automated tools I've tried. I haven't tried them all but I did play with a few of them. For example in your case the pause between "Removing" and "filler" doesn't match the pace of the rest of the sentence and the transition from "very" to "time" has a very hard cut. This is also a 10 word clip that's about 6 seconds. If you listened to a 1 hour podcast episode that was edited like this it would be much more noticeable. There's so many intricate and subtle details around when and what to cut to remove these things in a way where it's not noticeable. Are there any paths moving forward in AI / ML that can lead to this being indistinguishable from being humanly edited? I debated deleting this comment before posting it because it's a combination of feedback but also saying the service isn't something I would buy in its current state but I'd like to think it's more beneficial to post this to show there is a real demand for this service if it can be executed flawlessly. [0]: https://runninginproduction.com/ https://runninginproduction.com/

autoencoders 5y ago
The edit on the page is not the best. I agree!. Mainly, if your recording is unnatural (like that one) the edit is also unnatural. However, the tool works better in an interview podcast. I would strongly recommend to just upload a sample, and you would see a big difference. Regarding if ML would be indistinguishable from humanly edit. Hard to tell. I think it will be like self-driving cars in the future. 98% edits good 2% bad edits.

tokamak-teapot 5y ago

“The algorithm can also work with accents from other countries, such as Australian ones or Irish.” Other than which country, though? Presumably an English speaking one - UK? New Zealand? Canada? US?