4 ms·
I don’t know about the ACT, but the SAT in that time period was trivial to study for. I had one Barrons book, and the rest was accomplished by being a student i
by zzt123 5y ago
I don’t know about the ACT, but the SAT in that time period was trivial to study for. I had one Barrons book, and the rest was accomplished by being a student in a public school. There were no surprises come test day.
I genuinely don’t understand when people say the SAT is so biased, because it seemed quite fair to me compared to alternative metrics. Unless asking someone to spend a lot of time studying is too much to ask.
- abhiyerra 5y agoThe SAT isn't hard to study for, but the question is, if your dad is in jail (which many of my black friend's dads were), you are feeling uncertain about the world because of the color of your skin, would you put in the effort? I think people look at tests like the one and all, but many kids have other stuff to work out.
- keeganpoppen 5y agowhat part of this is fixed by getting rid of the SATs, exactly? do all the other problems that are making it hard to get on top of school suddenly disappear? do they magically disappear in college? how is it even beneficial to remove one possible avenue for demonstrating aptitude beyond the ability to succeed in a classroom environment, which is profoundly tilted toward rich families who can help kids with homework, bitch at teachers about bad grades, etc.?
- abhiyerra 5y agoStrength leads to strength. If you can get to a place of prestige and that place continues to have high standards, then the people who are bound for the streets or no purpose have a means to a higher goal. Maybe I believe that if you give people a little bit of chance, they end up better?
- keeganpoppen 5y agoah, so you just find a way to continue to have high standards while continuously lowering the standard for admission but that's not even the point... the post was about how students who don't care about school will somehow be better served by getting into a good school anyway. sure, some people will have an "oh shit i cant screw this up" moment, but... many will just fail. right? and in the meantime, the student who didn't get the chance to pursue their dreams... does what? it is unfortunately a pretty zero sum game. i wish it weren't. i think it'd be great for universities to figure out how to scale up much bigger than they are currently for exactly this reason.
- abhiyerra 5y agoI don't think you have to worry here. The people who take the SAT are a minority. We need to stop thinking everyone takes the SAT. It is not valid. This policy benefits the people who take the SAT, which is likely a minority of students.
- zzt123 5y agoHardly a minority of students. The year before the pandemic, 77% of college applicants took the SAT or ACT. That was 2019-20, after colleges had starting going whatever you want to call not requiring standardized tests. https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2021/09/13/study-reveals-which-applicants-didnt-submit-test-scores https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2021/09/13...
- b9a2cab5 5y agoIf you aren't willing to put in the effort for a multiple choice (easy) exam, you are failing any STEM college degree (the only ones that give you a chance at making it out of the poorhouse), straight up. Compared to the SAT intro calculus at any top university is magnitudes harder. If you admit the kids you're talking about under affirmative action they'd just be weeded out in intro courses and get relegated to some social sciences degree with negative return on tuition. That is objectively worse than rejecting them.
- abhiyerra 5y agoI have a History degree, and I'm doing fine. I'm sure most of the PMs who design the tech engineers build will also agree.
- b9a2cab5 5y agoYou may be doing fine, but objective measures of the average salary of humanities majors at schools like UCB say otherwise. Most of the PMs I know have either business or STEM degrees.
- abhiyerra 5y agoI guess we aren't talking about the same humanities majors. Most of my friends from Berkeley who are history or humanities majors are lawyers, academics, or doctors (yes, many of the humanities became doctors). They don't really seem to care about the money even though we as engineers seem they should care. Or they had to go through additional layer of study which depresses their true value.
- nobodyandproud 5y agoSo they took the easy road to get into medical or law school. What about the humanities majors that went straight into the workplace?
- ngc248 5y agoOk, lets take your example. why should the kid in your example get a step over a kid with a stable family. Even kids in stable families have dreams. Even stable families got problems.
- abhiyerra 5y agoI think they both need to meet in the middle. I came from a low-income family and had plenty of wealthy friends. Kids with stable families have money. Take away the money, and the thing that gave them the advantage goes away. For the poor kids, the money is no longer a blocker.
- nobodyandproud 5y agoYou know what meets in the middle? Standardized tests.
- sokoloff 5y agoI have no problem if a kid in that situation decides to not put in the effort. I also have no problem if decisions to put in more effort yield better outcomes.