Then you're much better at Weinsteinese than I am because I don't know what "perseveration" even means and how it applies to "gated institutions" and their narr

Then you're much better at Weinsteinese than I am because I don't know what "perseveration" even means and how it applies to "gated institutions" and their narratives. Does he have examples of institutions without gates, i.e. "ungated" institutions? Is he talking about any specific institution in particular or just abstractly and he's divided them all in some taxonomy that only he and his followers understand? Is he in favor of "ungated institutions" and their narratives? You can see how any sane person when they decide to analyze the statement would think the man is going senile. There is no real substance in the statement other than whatever the reader is willing to imbue into it, i.e. it is nonsensical. This is all before we even get to the part where he is claiming to have created a grand unified theory of everything which solves economic problems better than existing economics but is also just purely for entertainment purposes. The man is practically asking to not be taken seriously.