3 ms·
Seems like a good idea but it's tied to all the other nonsense happening on ethereum. Namebase seems better in my opinion because it is focused on DNS and nothi
by holonomically 5y ago
Seems like a good idea but it's tied to all the other nonsense happening on ethereum. Namebase seems better in my opinion because it is focused on DNS and nothing else. [1] Going forward I think that's how blockchains should be designed. Each one should be custom made for a domain instead of being universally programmable like ethereum.
1: https://www.namebase.io/ https://www.namebase.io/
- reginold 5y agoOh neat, is there a name for that idea of "Tons if custom blockchains" vs "a few centralized ones like BTC and ETH"? Today it seems like 90% of the marketcap of these things is in BTC or in ETH/tokens. But marketcap =! Value necessarily, so perhaps the future is a ton of interoperable blockchains.
- holonomically 5y agoI'm not sure if there is a name for it but it seems like a useful avenue of research. There is something called polkadot but I haven't looked closely into how exactly it works other than it being an interoperability layer for other blockchains. [1] 1: https://polkadot.network/ https://polkadot.network/