If this is true, then consider the following: If we know that: A) Superconductors can conduct a theoertical infinite amount of electricity when supercooled (s

If this is true, then consider the following: If we know that: A) Superconductors can conduct a theoertical infinite amount of electricity when supercooled (super-cooling being the key to this phenomena)... B) That there is a corollary; a relationship between electricity and information; that is, that electricity can carry information (unless you're reading this in the far future, the computer you are reading this on is proof of that! <g>), and a theoretical infinite amount of electricity can carry a theoretical infinite amount of information... C) If A and B are true, then that would imply that super-cooling -- is the key to being able to transfer a theoretically infinite amount of information, that is, there's a link, a relationship between super-cold things (super low temperatures) -- and the ability to pass information through it... So, that brings us to the title of this article: "Ultracold, superdense atoms become invisible". If this article is true, then not only is there a link between super-cold temperatures, the ability to pass theoretically infinite information through a superconducting material (which really just consists of atoms of the superconducting substance, which really just consists of probable repeating structure of that substance's atoms in space...) but also atom invisibility... So, if true, we have ultra-cold, invisibility, and theoretical infinite information... all at the same place, at the same time... OK, so with that background, I'm going to go for "full crackpot" here... <g> If atoms (or heck, any subparticle really, this would include any and every subparticle) -- become invisible when super-cooled -- then: Question #1: Are they really there, at all? (When super-cooled?) Question #2: If the answer to Question #1 is that they are not (again, when super-cooled), that they somehow collapse (for the time that they are super-cooled) and then re-emerge when heated (boy, wouldn't this solve all problems of all kinds of atoms and sub-particles "disappearing" and "reappearing" if true?) -- then here's "full crackpot": If all of that were true -- then couldn't any single atom or sub-particle (any of them, no matter how small) -- be modeled and/or viewed as INERTIA -- but INERTIA RELATIVE TO SCALE, INERTIA RELATIVE TO TEMPERATURE... or more specifically INERTIAL FIELDS RELATIVE TO TEMPERATURE, or even more specifically INERTIAL FIELDS RELATIVE TO TEMPERATURE, RELATIVE TO SCALE... Well, if one or more things, one or more aspects of the above logic is false, then the answer is 'No'... But who knows? Maybe it's possible... And then again, maybe it isn't... <g> In other words, if true -- all atoms, particles and subparticles, all of them -- are INERTIA (force) -- at their relative scale...