4 ms·
Thanks, that's very informative. Yes I am wondering about the rank and file actors/programmers, if there are only agents for the stars then it's not much of a
by biztos 5y ago
Thanks, that's very informative. Yes I am wondering about the rank and file actors/programmers, if there are only agents for the stars then it's not much of a system.
In situations like this do you have insight into the actual billing rate?
In my previous contracting work I always knew how much they were making on top of my work, but if I were a consulting company I'd probably take some pains to prevent the subcontractors knowing such stuff, just because of the risk of them cutting me out.
Whereas, in the classic agent model, more pay for you is more pay for them.
- bryanrasmussen 5y agoWell the amount they take really depends on what they can contract with the company they are selling you to, and sometimes they will make very little money on you in order to get you in there - better a satisfied customer than not. I will switch from USD to DKK which is what I am actually charging in normally. I was working at a large bank and the rate was 700 DKK an hour for me and the bank was paying 725 DKK, it turns out that the bank refuses to pay more than that because well banks are often cheap I guess. So it turned out the recruiter was only making 25 DKK an hour on this because the consultant they sent before me was such a disappointment that the bank was really upset with them and they needed to make it up to them. >In my previous contracting work I always knew how much they were making on top of my work, but if I were a consulting company I'd probably take some pains to prevent the subcontractors knowing such stuff, just because of the risk of them cutting me out. The contracts the recruiting companies give you prevent you from cutting them out during the project and for some time after that - generally around 6 months after. My experience is that the recruiter generally tries to charge 150 DKK on top of what I charge. The place I'm at right now is a Swedish company, the SEK is worth less than the DKK, the recruiting company couldn't get more than 750 DKK so I took a cut to 675 DKK per hour for 6 months with a possible 6 month extension, because otherwise I would have had to wait maybe a month to get a project paying 700 DKK per hour. As noted before you should expect to make twice as much money per hour as you do in a permanent position to take care of the risk involved and also because you have to handle stuff like your own pension, accountants etc. The risk is stuff like not have a job for 4 months, but for example if you manage to work say 2-3 years straight consulting you are obviously doing better at that point than full-time employment. Also as noted every now and then a project comes along with less hours and that can be a good way to recharge your batteries, for example my last project working 4 hours a day 5 days a week still gave me more money at the end of the month than my last permanent position gave me (just wage money though, not if I counted in such things as vacation money or pension in which case I was behind by about 5000 DKK) >Whereas, in the classic agent model, more pay for you is more pay for them. yes, it's true it doesn't work like that in theory but in practice it basically ends up working like that, in my experience it isn't difficult to find out how much they are making on you per hour and then demanding more per hour. If they have a good experience with you, client happy, your renewal coming up and you say you will renew for more money it makes sense for agency to take a cut. At the point you've been working 6 months and the client wants to renew all reasonable agent risk is gone and it's pure profit for them. on edit: clarified a point with how much the bank paid per hour. on edit2: clarified another point about working less hours on projects.
- bryanrasmussen 5y agoI will expand a bit on risk - as said should make double what you make in full time job (in wages) but that is sort of a rough estimate. For example my last full time job last year was 60 thousand DKK per month. On top of that get some small pension and some vacation money paid into a state fund. And of course if I get sick I don't have to worry. If you get sick as a consultant you should have insurance for that. So if I work 8 hours a day for 22 days a month at 700 DKK it gives me a little over double, 7.5 hours a day gives me a little bit under. but lets say you get into a dry spell where there are no projects for you, and you spend 4 months without. On the one hand this is basically 8 months of normal employment, if you have purchased insurance for this scenario it isn't too bad. If you haven't you may find yourself in a situation where you need to start using money that is actually supposed to go to paying off your taxes. That's bad because now you get fines for not paying taxes and your risk increases. As someone with ADHD this scenario is really bad for me, so just saying different people might have greater risk than others and should plan accordingly.
- biztos 5y agoWhat does that insurance look like? What's it called (in Danish if necessary)? I don't think I've seen something like "dry-spell insurance" before. Seems like it would be expensive, since the risk of a freelancer having (or taking!) four months without work is high, right?
- bryanrasmussen 5y agowell in Danish it would be lønforsikring - wage insurance - generally used by people who have a high monthly wage and want something to supplement dagpenge, which is the danish unemployment solution. Have screaming kid right now so can't elaborate more.