This is a fantastical claim when you think about it. You are effectively claiming that both (1) US citizens systematically choose politicians that are corporat

This is a fantastical claim when you think about it. You are effectively claiming that both (1) US citizens systematically choose politicians that are corporate friendly (because this is the more general truth—they are friendly to all entities with money) and that (2) this “choice” is so free that you can just “vote for someone else” (who?). Another (less fantastical claim) is that most politicians are corporate friendly and in turn you don’t really have such a free choise.