Co-author here, the discussion section of the paper details many of the limitations raised by commenters here in greater depth. People seem to be debunking clai

Co-author here, the discussion section of the paper details many of the limitations raised by commenters here in greater depth. People seem to be debunking claims that aren't made in the paper. I'm biased but I don't think Nature Scientific Reports can be accused of publishing clickbait in this case.