3 ms·
> Is it really that bad? It's plausible, but I'm skeptical. Demean was too strong a word, I need to follow my own advice better :). > Regardless, it is surely
by Shared404 5y ago
> Is it really that bad? It's plausible, but I'm skeptical.
Demean was too strong a word, I need to follow my own advice better :).
> Regardless, it is surely suboptimal. I wonder if there are more optimal approaches than "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all" (my Mom's advice)....can you think of any?
The three gates[0] are what I try (and admittedly fail miserably) to implement, though not in their original form.
I generally try for "Is it true", "Is it useful", "Is it kind" - in that order of precedence if they can not all be met.
[0] Is it true, is it necessary, is it kind.
- mistermann 5y agoI like it. I would evaluate it thusly: a) Is it true? I would say: overwhelmingly. b) Is it necessary? In an absolute sense: no. In a relative sense (say, if one has a specific goal in mind): Certainly maybe, but I would predict: Extremely Likely. > Is it kind. I suspect not. But then, I think HN'ers can have thick skin when required (say, if you are trying to optimize The System that we all live within).