3 ms·
Someone could be bribed to do "good" stuff too. I think the difference is quid pro quo plus the transfer of things of value that does not conform to existing r
by omgwtfbyobbq 5y ago
Someone could be bribed to do "good" stuff too.
I think the difference is quid pro quo plus the transfer of things of value that does not conform to existing rules.
- gruez 5y ago>I think the difference is quid pro quo plus the transfer of things of value that does not conform to existing rules. I didn't intend to say "well it could also be used for good so we should keep it legal", but yeah this is probably the better take. A better analogy might be: it's totally legal to persuade a judge of your case (ie. what the prosecution/plaintiff/defense does), and totally part of the legal process, but persuading a judge via bribes is illegal.