5 ms·

This is great knowledge. People should not be investing based on what's popular or what is being traded. Better hold than gamble. Monetary speculation should be

This is great knowledge. People should not be investing based on what's popular or what is being traded. Better hold than gamble. Monetary speculation should be dumb in a sound money system

bellyfullofbac 5y ago
True and true, but the current system is just a madhouse... The funny part is when people are confusing stock price with approval of the company/concept and its business soundness (also looking forward), e.g. with Tesla or cryptocurrencies.
SavantIdiot 5y ago
> Monetary speculation should be dumb in a sound money system Yeah, but no one is listening. From the richest to the poorest, it's all about "to the moon." 50% of my family and friends have RobinHood accounts and are day trading crypto (usually doge or shiba) ... and don't even know what it is. (A dear friend even spent $15k on a rig and thought i was lying when i said his crypto wasn't actually "IN" his digital wallet.)
- thebean11 5y ago
  What do you mean by "IN"? Are dollars "IN" your bank account? I'm not trying to make a tired argument about dollars being fake or something, I just don't see the distinction as far as wallets specifically are concerned.
  - knodi123 5y ago
    With cash, if you put a fortune in your shoebox it is "IN" your shoebox. The whole point of bitcoin is the distributed nature. Your wallet can be copied without altering any actual holdings or values, whereas a shoebox cannot. A bitcoin wallet is more like a safety deposit box key, than an actual box itself.
    - thebean11 5y ago
      That's not the comparison I made. I'm talking about a bank account not holding physical bills.
      - JumpCrisscross 5y ago
        > I'm talking about a bank account not holding physical bills Trusting the regulated bank isn't that far from trusting the monetary authority that gives paper bills value. Or, for that matter, for the 99% of people who have not verified Bitcoin's math and have not inspected the code running on the servers they buy Bitcoin through, trusting the techies who pitch the product.
        thebean11 5y ago
        That's..a different discussion. My point is that IN bank and IN wallet are both technically incorrect, but for basically all purposes correct. But yes, you are right that the vast majority of users of [piece of software] have not verified [piece of software] and are relying on other humans to basically tell them if they should or shouldn't run it.
        lottin 5y ago
        You have a point in that neither bank accounts nor bitcoin wallets are wallets in any shape or form, the difference is bank accounts are not advertised as wallets, but bitcoin wallets are. Also interesting that the bitcoin imagery is all about gold coins, when in fact there are no coins at all, virtual or otherwise. Bitcoin is merely an abstract unit of count. The very name 'bitcoin' is misleading. Everything about cryptocurrencies seems fraudulent in one way or another.
        thebean11 5y ago
        You really think people equate crypto wallets with physical wallets, more than they do bank accounts? Not sure I agree. I think it would be much better if they did equate it with a wallet. An account can be recovered if lost, a wallet cannot. Wallet encourages better behavior security wise IMO. I think you're grasping at straws with the coins thing..you really think there's an attempt to confuse people into thinking that it's..physical coins?
  - SavantIdiot 5y ago
    The difference is: (a) if I don't trust "computers" it absolutely can because I can use deposit box, and (b) the government guarantees that it is via FDIC insurance plus a long list of legal alternatives if it suddenly isn't there. Crypto has neither (a) nor (b); it is specifically designed to not have (a), and I don't see it having a (b) any time soon since regulation is anathema. I see your point. Both are ledgers. So in that way crypto and bank accounts are similar. But bank accounts can become cash. Crypto cannot. Now the argument shifts to "what is cash" but a different kind of ledger. We can argue why one is trusted more than the other, and perhaps 100 years from now crypto might be as safe as US dollars or Euros. But today there is a big, bit difference between a crypto wallet and a bank account. I find it especially confusing that many crypto advocates typically lament going off the gold standard, which makes my head hurt... Now that I argue this... i'm confused. Dammit, Beavis.
    - kranke155 5y ago
      Bitcoin was indeed founded by libertarians who believed the loss of the gold standard was the beginning of the end of western civilisation. It’s a weird belief but - what if they’re right ? What if it did cause a lot of the problems ? Maybe not directly, but by freeing the state from a boundary-setting limiter it somehow corrupted it? I don’t know the answer but Bitcoin is a bet that it did cause problems. And so far it’s a winning bet.
    - cblconfederate 5y ago
      you can store your private keys printed inside a deposit box if you don't trust computers (which you shouldn't). Nobody guarantees bitcoin, but insurance companies will always exist.
      - xboxnolifes 5y ago
        Ultimately you need to trust the blockchain, which runs on computers. Which is the commenter's point.
        cblconfederate 5y ago
- nightski 5y ago
  Well technically your private key is "IN" the wallet which is how you access the funds. So it's pretty close to the same thing.
- kwertyoowiyop 5y ago
  In the 90s a few of my friends decided to be day traders. It worked great until March 2000.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

This is great knowledge. People should not be investing based on what's popular or what is being traded. Better hold than gamble. Monetary speculation should be dumb in a sound money system

bellyfullofbac 5y ago

True and true, but the current system is just a madhouse... The funny part is when people are confusing stock price with approval of the company/concept and its business soundness (also looking forward), e.g. with Tesla or cryptocurrencies.

SavantIdiot 5y ago

> Monetary speculation should be dumb in a sound money system Yeah, but no one is listening. From the richest to the poorest, it's all about "to the moon." 50% of my family and friends have RobinHood accounts and are day trading crypto (usually doge or shiba) ... and don't even know what it is. (A dear friend even spent $15k on a rig and thought i was lying when i said his crypto wasn't actually "IN" his digital wallet.)

thebean11 5y ago
What do you mean by "IN"? Are dollars "IN" your bank account? I'm not trying to make a tired argument about dollars being fake or something, I just don't see the distinction as far as wallets specifically are concerned.
- knodi123 5y ago
  With cash, if you put a fortune in your shoebox it is "IN" your shoebox. The whole point of bitcoin is the distributed nature. Your wallet can be copied without altering any actual holdings or values, whereas a shoebox cannot. A bitcoin wallet is more like a safety deposit box key, than an actual box itself.
  - thebean11 5y ago
    That's not the comparison I made. I'm talking about a bank account not holding physical bills.
    - JumpCrisscross 5y ago
      > I'm talking about a bank account not holding physical bills Trusting the regulated bank isn't that far from trusting the monetary authority that gives paper bills value. Or, for that matter, for the 99% of people who have not verified Bitcoin's math and have not inspected the code running on the servers they buy Bitcoin through, trusting the techies who pitch the product.
      - thebean11 5y ago
        That's..a different discussion. My point is that IN bank and IN wallet are both technically incorrect, but for basically all purposes correct. But yes, you are right that the vast majority of users of [piece of software] have not verified [piece of software] and are relying on other humans to basically tell them if they should or shouldn't run it.
        lottin 5y ago
        You have a point in that neither bank accounts nor bitcoin wallets are wallets in any shape or form, the difference is bank accounts are not advertised as wallets, but bitcoin wallets are. Also interesting that the bitcoin imagery is all about gold coins, when in fact there are no coins at all, virtual or otherwise. Bitcoin is merely an abstract unit of count. The very name 'bitcoin' is misleading. Everything about cryptocurrencies seems fraudulent in one way or another.
        thebean11 5y ago
        You really think people equate crypto wallets with physical wallets, more than they do bank accounts? Not sure I agree. I think it would be much better if they did equate it with a wallet. An account can be recovered if lost, a wallet cannot. Wallet encourages better behavior security wise IMO. I think you're grasping at straws with the coins thing..you really think there's an attempt to confuse people into thinking that it's..physical coins?
- SavantIdiot 5y ago
  The difference is: (a) if I don't trust "computers" it absolutely can because I can use deposit box, and (b) the government guarantees that it is via FDIC insurance plus a long list of legal alternatives if it suddenly isn't there. Crypto has neither (a) nor (b); it is specifically designed to not have (a), and I don't see it having a (b) any time soon since regulation is anathema. I see your point. Both are ledgers. So in that way crypto and bank accounts are similar. But bank accounts can become cash. Crypto cannot. Now the argument shifts to "what is cash" but a different kind of ledger. We can argue why one is trusted more than the other, and perhaps 100 years from now crypto might be as safe as US dollars or Euros. But today there is a big, bit difference between a crypto wallet and a bank account. I find it especially confusing that many crypto advocates typically lament going off the gold standard, which makes my head hurt... Now that I argue this... i'm confused. Dammit, Beavis.
  - kranke155 5y ago
    Bitcoin was indeed founded by libertarians who believed the loss of the gold standard was the beginning of the end of western civilisation. It’s a weird belief but - what if they’re right ? What if it did cause a lot of the problems ? Maybe not directly, but by freeing the state from a boundary-setting limiter it somehow corrupted it? I don’t know the answer but Bitcoin is a bet that it did cause problems. And so far it’s a winning bet.
  - cblconfederate 5y ago
    you can store your private keys printed inside a deposit box if you don't trust computers (which you shouldn't). Nobody guarantees bitcoin, but insurance companies will always exist.
    - xboxnolifes 5y ago
      Ultimately you need to trust the blockchain, which runs on computers. Which is the commenter's point.
      - cblconfederate 5y ago
nightski 5y ago
Well technically your private key is "IN" the wallet which is how you access the funds. So it's pretty close to the same thing.
kwertyoowiyop 5y ago
In the 90s a few of my friends decided to be day traders. It worked great until March 2000.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]