4 ms·
>> How can insights be useful to others if no one sees them. That is the whole point of having an audience. Your point ignores what the poster says and then do
by zerkten 5y ago
>> How can insights be useful to others if no one sees them. That is the whole point of having an audience.
Your point ignores what the poster says and then doubles down on "audience". People setting out purely to "make money" often focus heavily on "building an audience" rather than "crafting content for an audience". There is a very subtle difference which results in them burning out before they hit critical mass, or strong competition from people who are ostensibly just writing for fun.
The point of writing down your insights, even with only a minimal audience, is that you capture and refine them. They may be worth much more to an individual in a consulting reference than as Substack subs. The context always matters though, but not everyone can have 1000s of subs on Substack or whatever replaces it.
- ghaff 5y ago>People setting out purely to "make money" often focus heavily on "building an audience" rather than "crafting content for an audience" The issue is not just burnout. It's that an emphasis on pageviews can (though doesn't necessarily) lead to crafting content that attracts clicks and engagement rather than content that actually benefits a potential audience (and yourself). It's not binary of course. Headline writers have been crafting titles that entice readers to read the rest of the text before there were clicks. But it's certainly more prevalent on the web.