You’re right that the relationship between DAOs and corporate entities is a gray area in law right now. But imagine this went to court and the plaintiffs said t

You’re right that the relationship between DAOs and corporate entities is a gray area in law right now. But imagine this went to court and the plaintiffs said that it quacked like a duck, so their assumption was for all intents and purposes it was a duck. What do you think the judge is going to say? I’m not a lawyer and not aware of any precedent here, but I imagine if it’s a total gray area the judge would say they are entitled to the same rights as one might find being a member of a corporation since that was the shared belief system at the time.