3 ms·
Of course, we know each other. Ur/Web for instance allows metaprogramming when Opa doesn't. But Opa handles distribution natively when Ur/Web doesn't. Some user
by hbbio 15y ago
Of course, we know each other.
Ur/Web for instance allows metaprogramming when Opa doesn't.
But Opa handles distribution natively when Ur/Web doesn't.
Some users say that both projects are of great quality, so I invite you to try both and make your own judgment. Some bits at http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/icp4u/yet_another_webscale_language_that_is_full_of/ http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/icp4u/yet_anoth...
- nimrody 15y agoThanks for the information! Ur/Web syntax seems closer to OCaml syntax, so it might be a bit easier to learn. However, Opa documentation seems more polished and complete so it might even the odds. Nice work, and thanks for bringing static guarantees to web development. It is much needed.