3 ms·
At least superficially, this seems close to UR/Web. (http://www.impredicative.com/ur/ http://www.impredicative.com/ur/). I assume you guys are aware of each oth
by nimrody 15y ago
At least superficially, this seems close to UR/Web. (http://www.impredicative.com/ur/ http://www.impredicative.com/ur/). I assume you guys are aware of each other. Can you tell us something about the advantages of Opa?
- hbbio 15y agoOf course, we know each other. Ur/Web for instance allows metaprogramming when Opa doesn't. But Opa handles distribution natively when Ur/Web doesn't. Some users say that both projects are of great quality, so I invite you to try both and make your own judgment. Some bits at http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/icp4u/yet_another_webscale_language_that_is_full_of/ http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/icp4u/yet_anoth...
- nimrody 15y agoThanks for the information! Ur/Web syntax seems closer to OCaml syntax, so it might be a bit easier to learn. However, Opa documentation seems more polished and complete so it might even the odds. Nice work, and thanks for bringing static guarantees to web development. It is much needed.
- Yoric 15y agoThe LtU thread now contains the start of a discussion on the topic.