4 ms·
I'm not sure what makes you right wing about being worried about school closures. We have studies showing worsening eyesight for children because of lockdowns:
by zpeti 5y ago
I'm not sure what makes you right wing about being worried about school closures. We have studies showing worsening eyesight for children because of lockdowns:
https://www.aao.org/eye-health/tips-prevention/covid19-pandemic-myopia-children-eyes https://www.aao.org/eye-health/tips-prevention/covid19-pande...
(that might have an effect for 100 years?)
A 7 year old child is extremely malleable, and especially socially needs an incredible amount of input to develop as a person. What you do today to a 7 year old for (currently) 2 years has a massive effect later.
Not to mention, how do you think a 7 year olds parents are affected by lockdowns who they are locked up with? Alcoholism? Up. Drug abuse? Up. Domestic abuse? Up.
So again, where is the guy wrong?
- skinnymuch 5y agoThink of the children is literally one of the major propaganda tactics the far right has used recently. You can look up save the children sort of stuff. No one doesn’t want to help children. It’s bizarre that Q anon sort of people are able to spin things as if they care about children more than others. Every one cares about children. > I’m not sure what makes you right wing The person consistently bashes the left and praises conservatives. I said that too. Not just school closures in isolation. What would you call someone who does that? Also I brought up the only association they do quickly make is saying they used to be progressive. Another common tactic taken by people who either never were and definitely aren’t now left of center at all. However they will keep leaning right without ever saying they lean right. A number of political internet personalities in the intellectual dark web continue to do this ploy to varying degrees. Two less egregious examples are Stephen Pinker and Joe Rogan. Two more obviously slanted examples are the Pool and Rubin guy. — > Alcoholism? Up. Drug abuse? Up. Domestic abuse? Up. I stated this in another comment. The status quo has never been good for children who were lower socioeconomically. All metrics: school funding, the amount learned, correlation between exam scores and going to university, all are unfair with our status quo. Why is there suddenly this behavior of caring for all children as if mostly the right and maybe some centrists who want schools open are the ones who care about children. The blogger specially said the left is bad because they kept schools closed. As if the left doesn’t care about children as much. All the issues you mentioned effect lower socioeconomic families more than any any other group of people. Where is the care for them when the war on drugs screwed stuff up for so long? It’s hard to believe these things are truly cared about when they have never been a focus for the vast majority of the country, both left and right, until the pandemic became insanely politicize and the right didn’t like the lockdowns.
- zpeti 5y agoYour entire argument is, yeah this happens anyway so why do we care. We care because these things have gotten worse in lockdowns, proven by numbers. Just because something has existed before, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t give a shit when it increases. Especially if you’re supposedly left wing which I imagine you identify with. “Poorer people always had more alcoholism and domestic abuse, so why do I care if it goes up if schools close” That’s a ridiculous attitude. Btw the whole point of politics and left and right should be that we discuss things and point things out to each other where they are going. Just because that guy to you is right wing doesn’t mean 100% of what he says is wrong. People both on left and right are right about certain things and certain times. That’s why we need debate and not polarization. You are dismissing OP for being right wing in your eyes, and dismissing everything he says.