> I'd use a typed language if I wanted one. I think the general point the above commenter is trying to make is that not all typed languages are equivalent: i.e

> I'd use a typed language if I wanted one. I think the general point the above commenter is trying to make is that not all typed languages are equivalent: i.e. if you're avoiding TS/typed ruby/etc. because you don't want something like Haskell/Java, then that's not a well-informed decision as they're (all) radically different approaches to static typing, each with their own unique benefits and drawbacks. TS is nothing like Java nor Haskell. Nor Rust. (I can't personally speak to Ruby/Pony yet)