> It’s more than human experts apply a posteriori the tools they typically use to analyse chess games to games play by AlphaZero. I largely agree with this and

> It’s more than human experts apply a posteriori the tools they typically use to analyse chess games to games play by AlphaZero. I largely agree with this and I was about to make the same point before reading your comment. However, as GP said upthread: > This paper builds on that concept and finds that not only are a superhuman AI's moves usually understandable by experts, but even some of the superhuman AI's internal representations are understandable by experts (!). Internal structures mapping to concepts high level players already use is a good indicator that the AI is "thinking" about chess in the same way as humans do.