I watched some of the cross examination as well as closing arguments by both sides. I'm by no means a legal expert so can't get into the weeds on all these leg

I watched some of the cross examination as well as closing arguments by both sides. I'm by no means a legal expert so can't get into the weeds on all these legal arguments but my common sense says there needs to be at least a consequence for a teenager who arms himself with a rifle, travels to somewhere outside his hometown and ends up killing two unarmed men (not accidentally) and severely injuring a third one. If the only consequence of such set of actions is an internship offer at the Congress then it only makes sense for other kids to emulate him.