3 ms·
That's a ridiculous take. By that argument all private companies are free to treat their consumers any way they like. Suggesting critical consumers "build their
by imiric 5y ago
That's a ridiculous take. By that argument all private companies are free to treat their consumers any way they like. Suggesting critical consumers "build their own" is childish and pure fantasy.
There's a reason consumer protection laws exist. The fact that governments haven't caught up to Big Tech doesn't mean companies are free from blame. Particularly ones with direct ties to one of the most oppressive regimes on the planet.
Xiaomi doesn't censor because of a business decision. It censors because it's mandated by the CCP and their relentless efforts of silencing speech that makes China look bad. It's the government equivalent of a sensitive bully that everyone tip toes around because of political and financial reasons. Leaky analogy, but this entire situation is indescribably dumb.
- topspin 5y ago> That's a ridiculous take. No, it isn't. It's genuine humor; an ironic absurdity derived from a kernel of truth. Best comment of the thread actually; a welcome exception to all of the whataboutery, hair splitting and reading comprehension mishaps.
- imiric 5y agoAh, indeed. I invoke Poe's law. :) Though I'd argue this is not the place for such comments. It only further perpetuates the lowbrow "discussion" on a very sensitive topic that, if nowhere else, this forum should be above of.