I don't think that quite saves a click. Yes, you've posted what the idea is, but completely cut out the entire point of the article (that the actual amount of r

I don't think that quite saves a click. Yes, you've posted what the idea is, but completely cut out the entire point of the article (that the actual amount of risk compensation that happens is usually low, and policy based on the idea tends to be more harmful)... Take the guardrail thing for example - you posted the arguments of proponents, but cut out the response where it goes through how the actual evidence shows it's not at all the case that guardrails increase risky behaviour!