>If you believe that wasn't/isn't the scientific consensus, then I welcome you again to find any public health official willing to state on the record how much

>If you believe that wasn't/isn't the scientific consensus, then I welcome you again to find any public health official willing to state on the record how much viral transmission they believe masks are preventing. I'll expand the challenge to include heads of top tier medical universities. And I'll even accept a range, like "between x and y%." You will not find such a thing. From https://www.ucdavis.edu/coronavirus/news/your-mask-cuts-own-risk-65-percent https://www.ucdavis.edu/coronavirus/news/your-mask-cuts-own-... >A range of new research on face coverings shows that the risk of infection to the wearer is decreased by 65 percent, said Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at UC Davis Children’s Hospital.