5 ms·
The best argument here I think is the self-referential nature of Web3. Many of the other ones are basically saying "It reminds me of the dotcom bubble", but ...
by zenlikethat 5y ago
The best argument here I think is the self-referential nature of Web3. Many of the other ones are basically saying "It reminds me of the dotcom bubble", but ... in the end, the Internet won big. At any rate, I miss the old web sometimes, where people threw up bizarre websites ranting about the occult, or their academic passion or what have you.
Crypto definitely does have a "playing with our food" feel a lot of the time, but I also think there's a privileged American perspective in turning your nose up at DeFi. In America we can generally count on a well regulated financial system, a stable currency, and a good climate to transact and do business. Many, MANY other places do not have this. If inflation is 10-20% like Turkey or Brazil, or your bank might bail in your assets to socialize losses like in Greece or Cyprus, or the only way to invest is through shady brokerages who might rip you off, DeFi is a fantastic alternative.
Not to mention some coins helping with the right to transact anonymously. The writing is on the wall for cash, and how many of you are thrilled about a world in which your every purchase and transaction is easily available to governments and corporations? It gets lost in all the hubbub, but Monero is one of the best privacy enhancing tools to come along in years. While it can be used for horrible things, it can also be invaluable to dissidents and other benign actors, just like cryptography in general can.
Fred Wilson's post on "the opening" re: the potential of NFTs I think is also worth a read -- https://avc.com/2021/08/the-opening/ https://avc.com/2021/08/the-opening/ It's hard to understand the memetic disease NFT participants catch until you're actually in the middle of it. Whether everyone will catch it or it will peter out is still up for debate.
- preseinger 5y agoThe writing is emphatically not on the wall for cash. Currencies are substantially more than just a mechanism for value exchange, they're deeply interwoven with the power and sovereignty of government.
- jurassic 5y agoThis. Until I can pay my taxes in crypto, the United States dollar isn't going anywhere.
- zenlikethat 5y agoI'm not saying the dollar will go anywhere, or even down. I'm saying that governments will continue to clamp down on the free exchange of physical cash, partially because of its privacy preserving abilities. Similar to how they have made volleys at putting encryption backdoors into many places.
- zenlikethat 5y agoI'm not saying fiat's value will decrease any more than normal, if that's what you're thinking. I'm saying clampdowns on physical cash (such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Indian_banknote_demonetisation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Indian_banknote_demonetis...) will continue, and maybe even ramp up. You don't think governments want to reduce and ultimately eliminate the use of physical cash with moves like this >$10K reporting threshold proposal, or India banning bills of large denominations, trying to implement a world corporate tax code, etc.?
- preseinger 5y agoAh, I misunderstood your intent. I understand where you're coming from and I agree that governments are incentivized to minimize cash transactions. Still, cash is fundamental to the notion of currency and I don't agree that it will ever go away completely.