3 ms·

The problem is that it's hard to define what's meant by interesting. It could be that companies who pay well have to because most people don't find their proble

The problem is that it's hard to define what's meant by interesting. It could be that companies who pay well have to because most people don't find their problems interesting so they need to pay more just to get people in the door, but there can be interesting aspects to almost any job and if you're the kind of person that focuses on finding the interesting in the otherwise boring then you'll tend to find the job interesting and feel like you lucked out in some way.

virgilp 5y ago
> because most people don't find their problems interesting so they need to pay more just to get people in the door, That's true when we're talking about a difference between 8$/h and 20$/h. If we're talking 50$/h vs 100$/h, or 100$/h vs 200$/h, I'm willing to take the bet that higher-paying job is going to be challenging enough. But indeed, it's also up to the person - in one job you may fix code, in another you may set up processes for entire teams, and if you just want to be left alone to code stuff that you like, what I said is absolutely not true (the opposite is - at some point you start to have to code less). Some other commenter nailed it - higher paid jobs tend to be more impactful. Whether "interesting" or not, that's subjective.