3 ms·
30$/user/year seems to be accurate. Facebook reported 86 billion USD for 2020 [1] and 2.89 billion MAU [2]. When computing the ratio, the geek inside me feels p
by anticristi 5y ago
30$/user/year seems to be accurate. Facebook reported 86 billion USD for 2020 [1] and 2.89 billion MAU [2]. When computing the ratio, the geek inside me feels particularly satisfied to reduce billion from the numerator and denominator. :)
So 2€/user/month seems priced well.
[1] https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2021/Facebook-Reports-Third-Quarter-2021-Results/default.aspx https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/...
[2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-dau/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-d...
- throwaway47292 5y agowait wtf why wont they just charge it then ffs i thought its 30 per month and thats why they dont do it, now i am even more upset for all the spying..
- throwaway47292 5y agooh wait, thats 2.8b mau but most of them are worth nothing, look at west europe and north america, and only subset of them, its like 200 million people that have to pay >>> (89000000000/200000000) / 12 37.083333333333336
- tiluha 5y agoMost people would not even pay a cent
- throwaway47292 5y agoi think the problem is that the people that will pay a cent are the people they are making 40$ per month from, and the rest of the MAUs are probably almost worthless so if they start charging, they will only lose
- kube-system 5y agoI wonder how many users are unbanked and can't even pay a cent.
- inter_netuser 5y agobecause data has some intangible value not reflected in the quarterly financials.
- arketyp 5y agoI wonder how much is enterprise revenue albeit the sites are used as personal services.