4 ms·
>where did I do that? It's mostly just the unwillingness to have a moderate view towards these currencies. Everyone on HN seems to have blind hatred steering t
by chaxor 5y ago
>where did I do that?
It's mostly just the unwillingness to have a moderate view towards these currencies. Everyone on HN seems to have blind hatred steering the discussion, rather than admitting that it may fail, or may become the main transaction currency in the future, or (more likely) somewhere between - such as becoming the major way in which large banks and institutions transfer currency between countries.
It's strange to me that people are using the argument of what behavior of crypto see right now will be how crypto will continue to be used in the far future. Unfortunately it got misconstrued in recent years to be an 'asset' rather than currency, but it's still possible for it to return to being seen as more as currency.
It could remain the same or change - but I don't see why everyone is so hatefully polarized over it.
- ChuckNorris89 5y agoAnd where exactly did I show blind hatred or unwillingness towards a moderate view? I gave you my arguments why BTC is now just a Ponzi scheme and not a currency or a good legal payment system, while you have not provided any kind arguments to support BTC as a payment system or as a currency and instead just complain that people have a blind hatred and what not. So I'm all open for a moderated discussion but you need to bring some arguments to the table not just complaints on the participants.