If your goal is preservation of Earth and not the human species then yes, that may be a sound action. > who knows what's best for everyone based on their own p

If your goal is preservation of Earth and not the human species then yes, that may be a sound action. > who knows what's best for everyone based on their own personal views and experiences, who takes no input from anyone else, because everyone else in the room is an idiot who doesn't understand the genius of their position... We're talking about von Neuman here. If I was to find myself in conflict with an assessment of his I would default to assuming I was likely wrong. From a statistical point of view anyone who wouldn't do the same is wrong to do so and ego, personality, or some other "thing" is likely getting in their way. It's not a big deal to cede to him imo.