4 ms·

"World domination through genocide is good, actually."

• sugarpile 5y ago
  Well that's a strawman. That is not a belief I hold and no where did I claim or imply I did. There's nothing in my comment, or in von Neuman's stance that I'm aware of that, that endorses world domination. I also don't see any reason to evoke the emotions associated with the word genocide either... What I believe is that preventing development and possession of nuclear weapons by other nations would very likely lead to less deaths over time than nuking Russia would have. Are you really not concerned that we as a species may eventually wipe ourselves out? I am.
  • user982 5y ago
    You are advocating for a United States hegemony via a monopoly on nuclear weapons, maintained by nuclear first strikes on the population centers of any other nation which might develop them. Is that an inaccurate summary?
  • watwut 5y ago
    "Genocide is good actually, even if you don't aim for world domination." And it is genocide, no different then any other genocide in history.
  • juanani 5y ago
    In this case of action, and I can't believe Neumann didn't let you in on the sillyness of his plan(if he was even aware at all), the first nation with nukes would have done everyone else a favor and minimized future 'wipe outs' by nuking themselves off. Sadly, he fooled you, or didn't see his hypocracy. Doesn't sound too bright imo. 2ez to idolize celebrities though.