5 ms·
I haven't used it so I have no idea. And all I've read is one comic about the architecture -- and while that comic is amazing, it still doesn't have every detai
by mechanical_fish 18y ago
I haven't used it so I have no idea. And all I've read is one comic about the architecture -- and while that comic is amazing, it still doesn't have every detail.
But I wouldn't be surprised if the multi-process architecture and the new JS engine turn out to make a surprising qualitiative difference in the performance of certain classes of JS apps.
Maybe so, maybe not. But even though I'm not writing anything particularly complex -- like, say, Gmail -- I've already had the thrill of working around situations where my one-lung JS interpreter is holding up the whole browser.
Heck, perhaps Gmail itself will be significantly smoother. Given the market penetration of Gmail, that would be a pretty good marketing hook for Chrome, all by itself.
- albertcardona 18y agoAn efficient javascript engine would enable, finally, awesome javascript graphics (via canvas).