3 ms·
> Distribution of Nano was more fair than bitcoin yes, that's what all pre-miners say. lightning network fees are negligible, you should try it one day.
by keymone 5y ago
> Distribution of Nano was more fair than bitcoin
yes, that's what all pre-miners say.
lightning network fees are negligible, you should try it one day.
- koonsolo 5y agoNeglectible is not 0. And I'm not a pre-miner
- keymone 5y agonegligible is basically 0. you're not a pre-miner (though maybe you are, how do i know?), nano "founders" are pre-mining scammers.
- catlikesshrimp 5y agoWhy should an average user care that founders are premining "scammers"? An average user won't be a miner and an average user doesn't have an investment in any platform. Someone saying x-crypto is a premining scam is somebody who invests in another platform and is advertising.
- keymone 5y agoBecause in PoS holders of large amount of assets are also political elite that gets to make the rules.
- koonsolo 5y agoNano is green, Bitcoin an environmental hazard :D. But I'm sure we're not coming to an agreement :D.
- keymone 5y agoNo environmental hazard, it's a myth. PoS is no greener than PoW, they are equally expensive. PoS is expensive in political plane (just like current financial system with all the corruption and wars) while Bitcoin is expensive purely in terms of energy. I know which one i prefer.