3 ms·
1.5 million seems woefully inadequate for just the security element of a pre-established plan. > The internet voting project is, for reasons unclear, categoriz
by AutumnCurtain 5y ago
1.5 million seems woefully inadequate for just the security element of a pre-established plan.
> The internet voting project is, for reasons unclear, categorized under the Open Source Voting project, despite “open-source” not being mentioned in the grant paperwork, Jerdonek, an open-source voting proponent, says. Open-source voting technology uses public computer code to process paper ballots. It is unrelated to online voting. On Tuesday, San Francisco Supervisors began crafting legislation to conduct a long-awaited open-source voting pilot.
This really concerns me.
- mgsafari 5y agoWhat about voting for an entire month without having to show id even though you have to show id to buy alcohol and cigarettes?
- onecommentman 5y ago1.5 M might be a nice number to start with as a bounty to anyone who demonstrably cracks the online voting system. Perhaps premiums paid if the vote tally numbers can be manipulated to be special numbers…pi, or a repeating pattern like 837-5309.
- ddingus 5y agoOptical scan is not hard, and is provable in election terms. As long as the record of voter intent is NOT electronic, the election can be hailed into court and sorted out worst case.