for free online news, perhaps. pay for stat, nytimes, economist, scientific american etc you will find journalists who cover science with good understanding. b

for free online news, perhaps. pay for stat, nytimes, economist, scientific american etc you will find journalists who cover science with good understanding. by the way few good science journalists would cover the story this way. instead they would mostly be quoting experts interpreting the significance of the various studies. And Scott Alexander would never be one of them. Can you imagine a nytimes science writer quoting a psychiatrist on ivermectin's effectiveness? Never happen. (also all of these sources' coverage of ivermectin has been much more limited because of the fact that the drug is a scam)